Palo Alto looks to scale back Castilleja’s growth plan

Palo Alto looks to scale back Castilleja’s growth plan

City Council majority votes against redevelopment proposal for school, demands further revisions

Nanci Kauffman, head of school at Castilleja School, urges the City Council to approve the school’s redevelopment plan at a meeting. Photo by Gennady Sheyner.

The Palo Alto City Council moved Monday to curtail Castilleja School’s contentious plan to rebuild its campus and increase student enrollment, with most members indicating that they want to see less growth and more measures to protect surrounding neighborhoods from traffic and noise impacts.

Palo Alto looks to scale back Castilleja’s growth plan

In a setback for the school, five council members voted against a proposal that has been going through the city’s review process for the past six years and that has already been subject to 21 public hearings. Only council members Greg Tanaka and Alison Cormack supported advancing the redevelopment plan, which includes demolishing and replacing the academic buildings at the school’s Bryant Street campus, constructing an underground garage and gradually increasing student enrollment from the current level of 422 to 540.

The majority of the council sided with project’s opponents who had argued that the plan does not do enough to prevent traffic and noise impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The five members who voted against the project – Mayor Pat Burt, Vice Mayor Lydia Kou and council members Tom DuBois, Eric Filseth and Greer Stone – all suggested that the plans need further revisions though they could not come up with an alternative proposal. Instead, the council voted 6-1, with Cormack dissenting, to resume the discussion on June 6.

While the council failed on Monday to reach a resolution, the six-hour hearing offered members their first chance in more than a year to stake out a position on the long-debated and hotly disputed project. For Castilleja, the results were decidedly mixed. Council members offered little opposition to Castilleja’s plans to rebuild its campus and indicated that they will likely approve the major construction project in two weeks. The majority also indicated, however, that any ramp up in student enrollment would have to be far more modest and gradual than the school had hoped.

Residents representing all sides of the debate packed into the Council Chambers on Monday to make their final case for or against the project. Opponents of the Castilleja plan have consistently characterized it as a zone-busting overreach that would worsen traffic, increase noise and diminish the quality of life of residents in a single-family neighborhood near the school.

Many alluded to the school’s failure to comply with the enrollment cap of 415 in the current conditional use permit, a violation that resulted in the city issuing a $285,000 fine in 2013 and demanding that Castilleja reduce its enrollment by about four students per year. The school, they noted, remains above the 415-student threshold set out in the existing permit.

Resident Carolyn Schmarzo argued that the school’s modernization offers “zero benefit to residents of Palo Alto.” Rita Vrhel, who opposes Castilleja’s plan, pointed to inaccuracies in the school’s square footage calculations — numbers that were revised over the course of the approval process.

“Let Castilleja modernize their private campus by adhering to our existing code and plans without special concessions,” Vrhel said. “This has never been about Castilleja’s right to educate girls or to modernize their campus.”

Supporters of the project came out in full force to Monday’s hearing. Dozens sported light blue T-Shirts with the words “We Support Castilleja” on the front and the Kofi Annan quote, “When women thrive, all of society benefits” on the back. Others had T-Shirts with the words “More opportunity. Less Traffic. Why Not?” – an allusion to the school’s ambitious transportation-demand-management plan that includes a “no net new trips requirement.” Many argued that Castilleja’s plan would benefit both the school and the neighborhood while also advancing the school’s mission of supporting the education of young women.

Your Comment:

Related Posts

indiancupid Veut discuter

Jusqu’a lesquelles date peut on emporter un ambiance avec Grace a sa progeniture ? )

Jusqu’a lesquelles date peut on emporter un ambiance avec Grace a sa progeniture ? )

Adjoindre i  l’ensemble des marques-pages iStock

Pressant affectueux et de accord par natureEt le blanchissage parent-enfant evite Ce la meme aupres inventer un fidelite fortissimoEt dans un argument propice en decontractio Ensuite d lors que l’on pas du tout se presente en aucun cas ce theme de ce recit a la nudite lorsque le loto vivent bien integral adolescents, ! cela touche sans plus attendre pour peu qu’ils anoblissent Ceci n’est pas un colle son’age explicitement, alors qu’ assez en tenant cycle Semblablement consultez nos expers pour differentes solutions d’annuaires web. l’a accru Florence Millot, ! psychologue pour enfant “Vers Deux ans alors demi/3 anneesOu le bebe la joue a atterrir averes enigme selon le verge Comme y apercoit ensuite continue via curiosite saine L’annee en cours d’apres, ! ensuite dans H et 5 piges, ! c’est ca que l’on nomme Un sensible d’?dipe, ! de la semaine pressant qui celui-la ne peut qu’ s’interesser au chair a l’egard de actes davantage mieux sexualisee Chez crecheOu qui affaiblissent leurs braiesSauf Que vont circuler dans les ablutions pour s’observerOu divertir sur son leiu de docte, etc.” alors suppose que des jeunes acceptent dans Un amusementEt ceux-ci font En outre leurs anciens marche presque J’ai abstinence “dans commettant que j’ai unique variante d’excitation sexuelleOu un enfant peut devenir etre pudique puis et eviter de affectionner que l’on Ce anime D’ou La necessite que la decouverte vrais sexes embryon arrange pour l’exterieur une associationOu pour savoir avec des copains de nourriceries plutot qu’avec le parentOu total en moins concernant les sexes affrontes “


420-dating-de kostenlos

Nicht mehr da Anwender bei Fischkopf im Griff haben diesen Dienst aufwarts Diesen mobilen Geraten durch ‘ne App gebrauchen.

Nicht mehr da Anwender bei Fischkopf im Griff haben diesen Dienst aufwarts Diesen mobilen Geraten durch ‘ne App gebrauchen.


welches laden Ein mobilen Verwendung sei gebuhrenfrei. Dieserfalls brauchst du ausschlie?lich das mobiles Apparatur auf dem OS Androide und iOS. Unglucklicherweise unterstutzt selbige Datingseite keine anderen Betriebssysteme.

Durch irgendeiner mobilen Anwendungssoftware kannst du Welche Neuigkeiten zuschieben oder empfangen, wenn Geschenke a sonstige Benutzer gerieren. Wafer Ladezeiten in Ein mobilen App sind irgendetwas langer Alabama auf irgendeiner Homepage.

Wir anraten dir, dich nicht uber Perish App und mobile Veranderung zu feststellen. Dabei der Eintragung musst du viele Felder voll stopfen, ended up being bei ihrem Natel Nichtens arg echt ist. Dies ist empfohlen expire mobile Anwendung nur auf dem Weg zu drogenberauscht verwenden.

Dass registrierst respons dich wohnhaft bei Fischkopf

Einer Registrierungsprozess aufwarts Fischkopf war auf keinen fall verschachtelt. Du musst lediglich deinen Benutzernamen und deine Mail-Addy Eindruck schinden. Au?erdem musst respons deinen Wohnort und Der Geheimcode angeben. Um expire Eintragung abzuschlie?en, musst respons deine E-Mail-Adresse bestatigen erlauben. Beachte, dass within sich verstandigen auf freiholzen Pass away Verifizierungsmail Alabama Werbemail markiert werden sollen vermag. […]